【媒體】平板電腦如何影響民眾日常生活?

2011年7月12日 星期二 by :::陽光馬戲團:::

作者 : 那福忠
更新時間 : 2011/07/11 19:24:25

(2011-07-11)【數位媒體風向球】當民眾生活早已被智慧型手機、個人電腦、筆記型電腦等塞滿生活時,若再加上平板電腦,會有什麼影響?他們接觸媒體的習慣有什麼改變?

圖取自蘋果App Store

(Brain.com 2011-07-11)自2010年3月到現在,蘋果的iPad已上市一年多,平板電腦的熱度直線上升,漸漸影響到我們日常的活動。
根據Forrester研究機構對 iPad 持有人的研究報告,有三分之一的人減少報紙的閱讀,另有8%的人增加報紙的閱讀,大多數人讀報未有增減。在紙本書籍上,28%的人減少閱讀,另有11%的人增加閱讀,其餘未變。在印刷版雜誌上,23%的人減少閱讀,另有9%的人增加閱讀,其餘未變。紙本書報雜誌的閱讀雖各有增減,減少的顯然多過增加的,可以解釋為iPad所替代。
線上出版人協會(OPA)的最新報告說,美國有12%網友擁有或使用平板電腦,明年預估增加到23%,在閱讀上平板電腦均優於其餘媒體,有66%的人說優於個人電腦閱讀,65%的人說優於手機閱讀,58%說優於印刷版報紙,57%說優於紙本雜誌,54%說優於電子紙閱讀器。

平板電腦正在轉變我們的生活形態

Harrison集團與Zinio聯合做的研究報告,說現在有28%的消費者閱讀數位書籍與雜誌,2008年僅有10%。而有平板電腦的人比沒有的人多用75%的時間閱讀報紙,多用25%的時間閱讀書本。擁有電子紙閱讀器的人,也同樣的比沒有的人多用50%的時間閱讀報紙,多用45%的時間閱讀書本,凸顯電子書閱讀器對書本的適用性。
這些平板電腦與電子閱讀器持有人多用的時間,是從哪裡來的?報告說來自上網遊逛與看電視的減少,估算這些人看電視的時間,約減少四分之一。觀察家認為這是娛樂媒體的根基變化,也是給電視主管的一個警訊。
除了閱讀,對電腦的使用也受影響。有三成的人說有了 iPad 之後就減少桌上電腦的使用,另有一成多的人說反而增加桌上電腦的使用;至於筆記型電腦,有26%的iPad持有人說使用少了,有一成的人說增多了。至於遊戲機、手機、MP3、電視,減少的人比增加的人略為增多,或是相等。最有趣的是,電子紙閱讀器如 Kindle 的使用,非但不因為有了 iPad 減少 (11%),反而加倍 (22%),可見電子紙顯示閱讀還有市場。
以上來自各方的資料,未必一致,也未必精確,但不難看出平板電腦確有閱讀上的優勢,出版業者宜視為警訊。
另一問題是出版內容如何在平板電腦展現,才能帶給讀者最好的閱讀經驗,現在大家都在摸索,但為了搶先,把印刷版或既有的電子版複製到平板電腦應付,也不在少數,但其中也不乏精緻製作。這裡特別介紹有 226 年歷史的 Augusta Chronicle。
這家美國南方最老的報紙,今年五月 iPad 版上線,初看之下雖然似印刷報紙的 PDF 版,但瀏覽之下卻發現有相當的特色,不失為有水準的製作。
這份報紙可以選擇日期下載,除了今天的報紙,還可以下載最近一個月的報紙。下載之後每一全版佔一頁畫面,用兩隻手指觸控畫面的放大縮小、四面移動,遠比 PC 畫面用滑鼠移動便捷得多。所以 PDF 仍有用在平板電腦上效益。
放大以後的字體,立即從模糊轉為十分清晰,不像有的雜誌從 PDF 版轉成 iPad 版,字體放大就不夠清晰。除了放大字體在原頁閱讀,還可以觸摸一篇文稿,這篇立即轉到新頁,以 2.5 吋行長的可讀字體,分三欄(橫式畫面)、或兩欄(橫式畫面)編排,讓閱讀更為輕鬆。
圖片處理最特別,觸摸一張圖片,立即在原頁中間另開一圖片視窗,顯示這張圖片。但顯示的不止這一張,凡與文稿內容相關所有的圖片,都「藏」在圖片視窗,都可用手指左右撥動觀看,看完圖片手指一點,圖片視窗消失,回到原頁。這份報紙或許沒按著一般的 iPad App 另行設計,卻能讓讀者舒適閱讀。
平板電腦不過是一種工具,哪一種工具能讓出版業運用得法,帶給讀者便捷舒適的閱讀經驗,就是贏家。現在叫平板電腦,幾年以後還不知道會叫什麼。

Filed under having 0 意見  

Why Competing with Apple Is So Difficult

by :::陽光馬戲團:::

Ben Bajarin is the Director of Consumer Technology Analysis and Research at Creative Strategies, Inc, a technology industry analysis and market intelligence firm located in Silicon Valley.

The desire to compete with Apple is widespread among many companies in the tech sector. The problem is that very few, if any at all, are well equipped as businesses to compete head on with Apple as very few have the same kind entrepreneurial culture as Apple.

Around 2005, our firm, Creative Strategies, began receiving more in-depth questions about why Apple is so successful. We were asked to do more specific analysis on Apple's strategy to shed light upon what some refer to as the “secret sauce” that drives the company. Much of this was because the success of the iPod was bringing Apple new customers in droves. And when the iPhone was launched, interest in Apple skyrocketed even higher.

Vertical Integration

But competing with Apple is difficult because Apple, Inc. is actually four diverse and thriving companies all wrapped up into one. It's a hardware company, a software company, a services company, and a retail company. Most technology companies in the world can manage one or two of these disciplines, but only Apple has all four entities working in harmony.

Apple, as we say, is vertically integrated. It controls all the major critical parts of the chain used to make and sell products. Apple builds great hardware, owns the core software experience, optimizes its software for that hardware, equips it with web services (iTunes and iCloud), and finally controls the selling experience through its own retail stores.

(MORE: How to Sell a Tablet: Apps and Price First, Tech Specs Second)

In contrast, most other PC, smartphone and tablet vendors make the hardware (Dell, Toshiba, Motorola, Samsung, etc), put someone else's software on it (Windows and Android), add third party services (Google, carrier services, etc.) and then sell it through someone else's store (carrier retail stores, Best Buy, etc.)

Competing with a company as vertically integrated as Apple means that PC and consumer electronics companies can, at best, compete with Apple in only one or two disciplines. While they might be able to create similar hardware, their lack of control of the operating systems as well as the services that are tied to these operating systems gives them little control over their markets. And no vendor has shown so far that it can compete with Apple in retail.

The only company that has even come close to being in a position to compete with more than two of Apple's core business strengths is HP. Its acquisition of WebOS is the primary reason, because now it can make hardware and the operating system software, and ultimately have more control of the user experience.

(MORE: HP Is Committed to Its 'WebOS' Platform (and It Should Be))

Even then competing Apple is difficult, because the company has proven to be a viable force to be reckoned with across all the areas within which it competes. In fact, if we take a hard look at the consumer and personal electronics landscape, we would be hard pressed to find a better hardware, software, services, and retail combination in the marketplace.

Technology as Art

Beyond that, Apple also has a culture that is completely unique, which is another part of the reason for its success. Steve Jobs in his many keynotes has pointed out that Apple's approach to products is that they are at the union of liberal arts and technology. And nobody in the industry so far has been able to match Apple's eye for design.

What this means is that there is an added dimension of design and technology as art that influences the thinking of those who work at Apple. This group is like a passionate team of artists who happen to turn their art into technology.

This is the major reason that Apple emphasizes simplicity. Steve Jobs has in many keynotes and demos said that Apple's various products "just work." What we must not forget, though, is that creating technology products that are simple is no trivial task. Simple solutions require sophisticated technologies. Apple knows this better than anyone and it has oriented itself to succeed at just that.

The advice we give to our clients is to pick their battles. They simply aren't oriented to compete on every single playing field as Apple.

MORE: Tablets: 'Why Should Somebody Buy This Instead of an iPad?'

Read more: http://techland.time.com/2011/07/01/why-competing-with-apple-is-so-difficult/#ixzz1RslckpLN

Filed under having 0 意見  

HOW TO: Optimize Marketing Copy For Mobile

by :::陽光馬戲團:::

The Mobile Content Series is supported by Mygazines, the better way to enhance and distribute brochures, catalogues, newsletters and other documents on every device. To complement this post, view an exclusive videocast, “Mobile Content Delivery: Native App Vs. Web App”.

When writing copy for any medium, it’s easy to drown in a sea of lead-ins, clever anecdotes and introductory sentences. There’s hardly time for that on the web. Marketers don’t have the luxury of leading up to anything. The only option is to be direct.

Website visitors typically won’t read big blocks of copy — they want to get in and out and move on to the next site. Think of copywriting for mobile as distilling down web copy even further. If web copy is skimming the cream off the top of the milk, mobile copy is skimming cream off of the cream.


What Makes Mobile Unique?


Users on the web are notoriously distracted and hop around from page to page. Mobile users are distracted even further. Their devices are buzzing with push notifications from their apps, text messages and emails are constantly popping up on the screen. They might be standing in line at a grocery store, waiting for a movie to start, in a taxi, in an elevator or walking down the street. These scenarios — and mobile use in general — are defined by three key factors:

  • 1. Pockets of Use. Picking up their mobile device is a secondary task. They’re just trying to fill up a pocket of time while doing something else. Users have just a few moments to check their phone or look up a piece of information while they’re completing a primary task (waiting in line, elevator, etc.).
  • 2. Perpetual and Inherent Distraction. Traditional web users may face distraction from email, chat and the infinite number of other webpages they could be on, but when those users land on a page, they typically stick around until they become bored or want to check out some other piece of information on the web. Mobile users, on the other hand, face perpetual off-device distractions — use of their mobile device is secondary. Byrne Hobart, founder of investment research firm Digital Due Diligence, observes that mobile marketers are “writing for an audience that’s in the middle of something else.” They might be waiting for their subway stop, their floor on an elevator, their line to be called at Whole Foods, a friend to show up at a restaurant. Point is, the number of off-device distractions for mobile users is limitless.
  • 3. The (Very) Small Screen. Mobile devices have tiny screens — they simply do not fit a lot of content. It’s critical that marketers keep this in mind as they write copy. What will fit onto a user’s screen without scrolling?

Mobile Is How We Live and Communicate


When creating mobile content, keep in mind what it represents. For many users, their phone is the headquarters of their lifestyle. It’s a connection to friends, family and coworkers. It’s a locker for nostalgic photos and texts from last night that probably should be deleted. Users personalize the background, download apps that fit their needs and look up information on the go. For many users, their phone is the first thing they see when they wake up and the last thing they see when they go to bed. It’s by their side 24/7, and it’s their connection to the world.

Marketers — and everyone else — should keep this in mind as they create content for mobile. Here are some things to consider when writing for mobile.


Be Goal-Oriented


The Hyperfactory‘s Joanne Eberhardt notes that the best mobile content “cuts copy to a minimum and only spews the necessities — necessities being what your target should see during those fateful two seconds that determine a click/tap.”

Hobart suggests that content be laser-focused on a specific task. “People are less inclined to meander on mobile apps and web — they’d rather meander in the physical world, given the choice.” Create content focused around your goals and avoid going on tangents — mobile users simply don’t have time or interest.


Use Strong Headlines: Think Like You’re Tweeting


When I reached out to the Grand Hotel group’s head of digital, Steven Rojas, he insisted that this interview be conducted over SMS to ensure the conversation was mobile-content-friendly. Rojas manages a number of Twitter accounts, so I asked him to share his secret for perfect mobile content. It’s easy he says, “Make it quick. Make it smart. Make it witty. And above all make it retweetable!”

Even if you’re not writing a tweet, think about the word “retweetable.” Really, what Rojas is eluding to is that the best mobile content is tweet-worthy, even if it’s not being written for Twitter. Mobile copy should be very much to the point while sacrificing as little power as possible. Get an idea across quickly. To do this, content will have to be quick and clear so that users get the point right away, but with just enough mystery and intrigue to encourage them to continue reading and to also share the content with others.


Screen Sizes Vary Among Mobile Devices


When writing copy for the web, space on the page allows for visual cues that can draw the readers’ eye towards the marketer’s objectives. Anna Lindow, director of marketing strategy at personal finance startup Bundle, points out that “when it comes to mobile, copywriters have to place extra consideration on being extremely direct, clear and succinct, because presentation options will likely be limited or even inconsistent across devices and platforms.”

Sam Altman, CEO of Loopt, has spent a lot of time thinking about the best way to create a mobile experience. Altman stresses that “it’s important to get your brain to think within the confines of a small, mobile screen and avoid the tendency to think big and then just shrink it.” The “shrink it” mentality just creates more cycles and more iterations. “If you switch your thought process, you’re more likely to get it right the first time,” Altman explains.


Frontload Your Content


Most of the time, people are only going to read headlines or the the first couple lines of marketing content. Therefore, it’s important to put the most important content up front. Don’t hold back and don’t rely on leading up to something big. Put the big reveal up front!

Think about how readers will browse the content. Try to avoid requiring too much clicking, but you also don’t want long pages that require a lot of scrolling. The way to do this is to be concise and efficient with your words — minimize the number of pages that readers have to click through. Try to keep content on a single page, if possible. But don’t cram so much onto a page that the site takes a long time to load — users will give up if they have to wait too long.


Test Your Content to See What Performs Better


Eberhardt encourages clients to experiment and find a balance between information and space. “It’s a continuously evolving industry with technology and trends, and you cannot be afraid to make waves,” she says. Marketers and clients too afraid of turning away possible clicks or downloads sometimes end up creating extremely safe and dull material.

One way to find out what works is to test two versions of your copy. Use tools like Google Website Optimizer to try out two (or more) versions of your content. A/B testing tools allow marketers to pit two versions of the same content against each other. The software splits users into multiple groups, showing different versions of the content to each one, and then automatically selects and implements the content that results in the most conversions, whether that be click-through rate, time on site, etc.

You should also use humans to test the content, as humans will be reading it. Nearly all mobile content is created on desktop computers with big screens, desktop browsers and a mouse. You should have a few people play around with the site on a real mobile device — not simulators — to provide feedback on usability and readability.


Copywriting for Apps


Generally, content for apps should follow the same rules as any other copy for mobile, but there’s a bit more to take into account. When it comes to apps, usage will be a bit more deliberate than the general web. While users on the web could be looking for anything, app users tend to be a bit more focused. They are actively opening an app, so bigger imagery and more text might be appropriate, especially because it’s built into an app and thus won’t have to load over often-shaky mobile connections.


Conclusion


Creating content for mobile isn’t the same as creating content for the desktop web. Acknowledging and embracing that fact is key to successful copywriting for mobile. Think about the limitations of small screens, constant distractions and low-quality mobile web connections. And don’t forget to try your content out on real humans using real mobile devices. Readers on the go want bite-sized information that will serve them in that very moment. Give them what they want.


Filed under having 0 意見  

Web Analytics and Optimization for Content Sites

by :::陽光馬戲團:::

Posted on August 21, 2007 by Mike Sukmanowsky

A common problem that faces many organizations hosting a strictly content-driven website is how to turn the data thrown out by any of the applications out there into something you can monetize. Sure, more page views mean more impressions which means more cash for your company, but what if you’re tagging a series of event-based activities (see Best Practices – Tagging Flash Files) which don’t generate additional impressions? Then the influx of page views you begin reporting isn’t actually contributing anything towards your bottom line, but it’ll certainly seem like you’re having a stellar quarter from your analytics reports.

(Side note here: this kind of thing can be solved with a separate profile that filters out all the “extra” activity you’ve tracked along the way)

The metrics I follow for content-based sites that heavily rely on advertising dollars to fuel revenue can be grouped into three categories, which in tern actually lays out the analytics and optimization strategy for these sites:

  • Growth
  • Loyalty and
  • Engagement

All content-driven sites generally want to tell the same story of growing their visitor base and keeping them coming back constantly while they consume (engage with) more and more content on the site. Before I go any further, let’s take a second to get our heads around why this is a model for success.

Why should I care?

At the heart of content-driven sites is ad revenue which is provided via impressions. Companies usually agree on a Cost per Mille / 1000 (CPM) impressions delivered and just like that, we have revenue. So at first the initial thought throughout the industry was “more page views = more impressions = more $$$”. This wasn’t a bad way to think about things, after all page views are a measure of engagement with your content, and page views is a metric that’s easy for anyone to monetize.

The problem lies with the fact that focusing on this one metric got people spending and focusing on the wrong things. In desperate efforts to drive up ad revenue that was likely tied to many people’s bonuses, site owners looked towards acquiring more visitors as their best bet to drive up page views. Efforts like SEO and SEM were seriously utilized in order to drive as many eyeballs to your site as possible – why? Because that’s all that advertisers cared about.

But there was an underlying problem with this method; driving a bunch of people to your site that hate what you have to offer is analogous to a leaky bucket. You keep pouring in money towards your acquisition strategies, but you never realize return on your investment when all your visitors just pop in and pop out of your site. Also, it becomes hard to charge higher CPMs to your advertisers if all you have to offer them is “500,000 people came to our site last month…but only 10% clicked through and only 5% ever returned.”

The other problem with the “grow first, ask questions later” model, is that without engaging content, you’re never getting the maximum amount of value out of the visitors you attract to the site.

Say I have a site with average monthly visits (not visitors) of 500,000, the average number of page views per visit of those visitors is 2, the average CPM for all my inventory is $10 and the average number of ads per page is 3. Using these numbers, my monthly ad revenue is (500,000 * 2 * 3) / 1000 * 10 = $30,000. Now assume that by focusing on optimizing my visitor’s site experience (see Bryan and Jeffery Eisenberg’s Book), I’m able to drive page views per visit up to 4. Note: I didn’t grow my visitor base at all, I simply got that visitor base to look at more of my content. The result? An incremental increase in monthly ad revenue of $30,000 a yearly increase of $360,000. And I didn’t even have to spend a dime on SEM and SEO – see what your CEO thinks about that!

What the above discussion hopefully demonstrated is a successful acquisition strategy is just one component to a content-driven site’s success. Once you’ve driven more people to your site, you want to keep them and you want them to love what you have to offer and there we have growth, loyalty and engagement.

Ok, I get why this is important…but what do I do?

Oddly enough, the easiest part of the growth, loyalty and engagement strategy is actually growth. There are plenty of methods out there to grow your visitor base (namely SEO and SEM), but it’s far more difficult to have a loyal visitor base and one that engages with your content.

What I recommend then is a backwards approach. First focus as much as possible on delivering engaging content to your visitors, then move onto looking at ways to improve loyalty and finally examine your growth strategy. The result of this strategy is a far higher return on all the dollars you’ll spend at your growth stage as well as, and this is far more important in my book, a far greater site experience for your visitors.

Great, but how do I know I’m delivering engaging content?

This is where web analytics fits in. The metrics (they’re actually key performance indicators (KPIs), but no worries) I prefer to use to gauge how engaging your content is are pretty simple (many of which borrowed from Eric T. Peterson):

  • Average Pages Viewed per Visit
  • Average Time Spent on Site
  • Percent of Visits Greater than 60 Seconds
  • Percent of Committed Visits (> 5 page views per visit)

The above metrics are available from most tools, but let’s take a look at how to grab them from Google Analytics.

Average Pages Viewed per Visit and Average Time Spent on Site

Both of these guys are pretty easy as you can grab them right out of your dashboard report as soon as you open up your profile.

Just look for Pages/Visit and Avg. Time on Site.

Percent of Visits Greater than 60 Seconds

60 seconds is a threshold you can adjust depending on the content on your site. 60 seconds may be too long or too short for the type of content you have so you’ll have to use your discretion. Google Analytics also won’t often allow you to grab the specific segment you’re looking for so you may have to suffice for something different.

As for pulling this data, navigate to your Length of Visit report which can be found under Visitors -> Visitor Loyalty. Feel free to add this report to your dashboard for easy reference later on. You’ll likely have to do a little bit of addition to get the number you’re looking for, but that’s no biggie.

Percent of Committed Visits (> 5 page views per visit)

Again, this is a metric that can be adjusted if needed. 5 page views per visit may be a bit too much or too little to be considered a committed visit. To pull this information, navigate to your Depth of Visit report which can be found under Visitors -> Visitor Loyalty. Feel free to add this report to your dashboard for easy reference later on. You’ll likely have to do a little bit of addition to get the number you’re looking for, but that’s no biggie.

Cool! Now onto loyalty…

It’s logical to assume that really terrific, engagement content should always keep people coming back for more, but these days that may not be enough. What I try to remember is that the internet space is no different from any other and the dot com crash proved that. A truly unique value proposition that gives me (as a visitor) something I can’t get anywhere else and delivers incredible value at a low price (price doesn’t have to be in dollar amounts, what about my time and patience?) will always make me want to return. The name of the game is satisfaction.

Your best metrics to gauge how well you’re doing at keeping a loyal visitor base then are:

  • Percent Returning Visitors
  • Percent Loyal Visitors (> 5 visits per month)
  • Average Visits per Visitor

Percent Returning Visitors

The number of returning visitors (actually, this is visits in Google Analytics) as a percentage of your entire visitor population for a given time period. This data can be pulled from the New vs. Returning report which can be found under the Visitors menu. Feel free to add this report to your dashboard for easy reference later on.

Percent Loyal Visitors (> 5 visits per month)

As usual, adjust the “> 5 visits per month” threshold to whatever makes the most sense to you and your site’s content. If the site is updated every day, loyal visitors may be those visiting more than 15 times a month.

To pull this data, navigate to the Loyalty report which can be found by navigating to Visitors -> Visitor Loyalty. Feel free to add this report to your dashboard for easy reference later on. You’ll likely have to do a little bit of addition to get the number you’re looking for, but that’s no biggie.

Average Visits per Visitor

This one is pretty well a no brainer, we’d all like to see the average number of visits per visitor improve but you’ll still have to work on baselines as to what’s appropriate for this KPI. You can calculate this metric directly from your pre-configured dashboard. Just divide visits / visitors.

Woo hoo! Now onto growth!

As previously stated, growth is probably the easiest place to improve upon in this three prawned strategy. Your most popular acquisition sources will likely be SEO and SEM, but there’s all sorts of partnering to be done with other content sites, affiliate networks and plenty more. Don’t let keyword buying occupy your entire acquisition universe and make sure to evaluate the success of your keyword buys by looking at the growth, loyalty and engagement metrics for just that section of visitors (you’ll have to create a new profile to do this).

I should probably note that I say “easy” in that growth has the most easily available options to you for improvement. However, actually picking the right targeted sources is by all means not easy and many marketers have to struggle with these problems everyday (hence the birth of behavioural targeting).

That being said, your two best metrics for evaluating how well your growth strategies are working overall are:

  • Percent New Visitors
  • Ratio of New to Returning Visitors

Percent New Visitors

The percent of new visitors (or visits in Google Analytics) can be an interesting metric to monitor when employing a high powered SEO/SEM strategy in that you want to ensure your efforts aren’t attracting an existing visitor base. This data can be pulled from the New vs. Returning report which can be found under the Visitors menu. Feel free to add this report to your dashboard for easy reference later on.

Ratio of New to Returning Visitors

Finally, the ratio of new to returning visitors provides an excellent way to understand what strategy your site is pursuing (whether intended or not). For example, a ratio of new to returning visitors of 3 would say, “for every visitor that returns, I bring 3 new ones in”. Ideally speaking, you’d like to see a ratio of new to returning visitors of around 2 in order to keep a healthy growth rate, but ensure that enough of your growing audience is still returning.

A ratio that’s higher than 2 indicates your site is in “growth mode” and your acquiring more visitors than you’re keeping. A ratio that’s lower than 2 indicates that although you’ve got a very loyal audience, you may want to look into some ways of growing it out.

This metric can be pulled from the New vs. Returning report which can be found under the Visitors menu. Feel free to add this report to your dashboard for easy reference later on.

Now tie it all together…

Just in case anyone got a little side tracked with that run thru let’s put those metrics in perspective again:

Growth

  • Percent of New Visitors
  • Ratio of New to Returning Visitors

Loyalty

  • Percent Returning Visitors
  • Percent Loyal Visitors (> x visits)
  • Average Visits per Visitor

Engagement

  • Average Pages Viewed per Visit
  • Average Time Spent on Site
  • Percent of Visits Greater than 60 Seconds
  • Percent of Committed Visits (> x page views per visit)

Finally! Now that we’re all on the same page about why growth, loyalty and engagement are the aspects to a good strategy for content-based sites and we have the accompanying metrics to evaluate the success of that strategy we’re set for success! Of course I’m leaving out a big part of the strategy for success which are the actual changes to make in order to improve these metrics, but that’s supposed to be the fun part that’s left up to you!

Filed under having 0 意見  

快速消費產品 (FMCG) 的快速行銷之道

2011年7月10日 星期日 by :::陽光馬戲團:::

產業新聞, 21.06.11

六十年前,電視、廣播和平面媒體支撐起廣告界的一片天,消費者只能被動地接受廣告主所傳遞的訊息。時間軸拉到今日,由於數位頻道、種類、工具的爆炸以及數位內容的多樣豐富,廣告主有了更多的平台可供選擇,但消費者變得更不容易掌握,廣告訊息必須強調即時性、關聯性、參與性和互動性,尤其鎖定大眾消費群的快速消費產品,行銷競爭更是前所未有的激烈。就行銷工具的選擇上,網路廣告除了能讓廣告主在有限預算下達成以上目的外,也能提供較高的效益及投資報酬率。從另一層面來看,網路更提供了一個整合的平台,讓產品能進一步與消費者產生互動進而刺激消費行為
舉例來說,以往電視廣告只能透過買時段的方式粗略的鎖定目標觀眾,而廣告主也只能從收視率評估廣告效益,但隨著網際網路的發達和社群媒體的蓬勃發展,電視廣告可以迅速在社交媒體上竄紅,而消費者可以用「讚」來表達對一個產品或品牌的支持,也就是說電視廣告在網路世界裡有了更多可以針對潛在客群的曝光機會。對廣告主而言,如何在眾多網路媒體中選擇最有利的平台、如何設計出引發目標族群共鳴的內容及提供創意的互動將是從眾多競品中脫穎而出的關鍵。
當今媒體趨勢: 網路+電視

尼爾森針對12-65歲的受訪者進行一年一萬份的調查,發現過去10年中,電視的昨日接觸率表現持平,而報紙、雜誌、廣播則下滑10%左右,唯獨網路媒體呈現逐年成長的態勢。十年前,網路的昨日接觸率不到20%,而2010年第三季已經來到52.2%,成長幅度超過兩倍,直逼報紙10年前的昨日接觸率,並且在2007年首度超越報紙。由此可見,電視及網路已是當今媒體的兩大主流。那麼在一天當中,兩種媒體的使用狀況又是如何? 經調查發現,15-49歲的受訪者,於平日的一天24小時中,有17小時的時間網路使用人數高於電視收視人數,且其高峰點剛好落在電視高峰的前後,這意味著網路提供了一個與電視廣告互補的平台。

尼爾森研究指出網路搭配電視的廣告行銷活動,會帶來一加一大於二的成效。回過頭來看實際的廣告投放會發現,網路廣告存在大量的成長空間。2010年電視廣告量達244億,而網路廣告量(就橫幅廣告部分)僅有46.5億的規模,與網路可以接觸到的人口比例來說,如此的投放量顯然不成比例。

擁有廣大用戶  MSN是最佳數位行銷平台
台灣網路資訊中心5月24日公布最新統計,台灣地區上網人口已達1,695萬,與去年相較上網人口成長了73萬人。而根據創市際市場研究顧問公司3月份所做的調查,MSN接觸人口將近1,000萬,換句話說,平均每1.7個上網人口就有1個人使用MSN平台。若更進一步探究使用者輪廓會發現,19歲以下的用戶占了13%,而20-39歲占了63%; 上班族占了50%,學生則占了30%。此外,Windows Live Messenger已是台灣第一大即時通訊,用戶高達800萬,微軟內部監測資料等研究數據亦指出:平均一天使用人數達260萬; 用戶平均一天登入4次且使用時間長達3小時; 透過Windows Live Messenger發送的訊息每天每人約53則; 使用者好友名單約有100個(亞洲排名第三); 使用的高峰期為早上9-12點、下午2-6點以及晚上10點以後,若與整體網路使用狀況相較,會發現兩者高峰時段相互呼應。

MSN祭出吸睛四大法寶 要消費者好看
既然廣大消費族群對MSN平台有了相當的黏著度,接著就要來看,微軟數位廣告如何藉由MSN這個強大的數位平台協助廣告主提升品牌或產品知名度及好感度。法寶一: 在Windows Live Messenger上設計有趣好玩的表情符號或互動遊戲,透過網路的號召力與感染力提高廣告產品印象; 法寶二: 利用MSN頻道資源,量身訂做合適或搭配時事的廣編特輯或品牌專題,達到精準深入的溝通; 法寶三: 透過高畫質Silverlight製作呈現影音專屬平台或多媒體影音廣告,吸引消費者目光; 法寶四: 不管是網路或實體的聯名合作,小綠人為MSN所創造的品牌價值可間接為廣告商品帶來正面加值並創造話題。關於上述四種數位行銷工具的實際應用,可參考水果變聖代,數位行銷四大心法讓品牌滋味更誘人。
精彩案例分享一: 黑松茶花 花太郎縮哩篇
黑松茶花在市場上已經打開知名度,唯仍需要藉由持續的廣告露出達成品牌形象的延續、溝通產品雙倍升級的訊息,以及全面提升品牌的好感度。業主選擇Windows Live Messenger平台作為整體廣告訊息的擴散延伸,利用MSN提供的IM樂分享、Personal Expressions主題封包及創意視覺內容延續產品話題性,並利用社群媒體達到與目標客群互動。該行銷活動一共吸引將近30萬網友造訪活動網站,且Rich Media的點閱率達 3%。

精彩案例分享二: 薇閣精品旅館大直店開幕
業主欲利用薇閣小電影作為與競品區分的賣點,並以不同以往的廣告呈現方式挑起消費者前往消費的慾望。微軟數位廣告為業主做了一系列的線上廣告活動,包括在MSN娛樂影音館搶先首播引爆話題; 利用MSN娛樂頻道播放電影預告片,提供電影時刻表及簡介,邀請消費者到電影院欣賞; 以及充分利用無須進行線上搜尋即可觀看的Messenger瘋狂影音秀 (且考慮到影音內容,微軟數位廣告利用Targeting技術鎖定18歲以上的用戶)。該行銷活動在推出後短短兩周內創造了10萬個點選,而與MSN合作的電影頻道置入行銷在網路上亦引發了超過2萬5千個議題討論。

Filed under having 0 意見  

蛇打七寸!掌握網路使用者行為與思維的關鍵報告

by :::陽光馬戲團:::

研究報告, 17.06.11

難捉摸的網路使用者行為樣態一向是行銷人員最想搞清楚的秘密,隨著人們的網路媒體使用素養逐日提昇,你知道網友的使用動機與行為模式又已悄悄產生改變了嗎?藉由一份由Microsoft Advertising與MEC、Mindshare所共同進行以網路使用動機為主題的跨國與跨年代(2007-2010)之研究報告,將可讓行銷人員對目前網路使用者的行為樣態與思維有更精準的掌握,以能進一步擬定更投其所好且有效的行銷策略。
這些年,網友的上網動機與行為產生哪些改變?
研究顯示,2010與2007相比,網路使用者的上網動機與行為模式有了下列變化:

  • 動機的改變:網友上網仍是以「溝通」為最主要動機,例如使用即時通訊服務、收發電子郵件等。值得注意的是,例如寫網誌、上傳照片與影片等「創作」動機強度在這次研究裡被發現有明顯的提昇。
  • 行為的改變:發現與2007年相比,網友從事資訊搜尋行為(例如搜尋某一件特定新聞或產品相關資訊)的時間比例有下降趨勢(減少3%),反倒是線上觀看/下載影片、玩線上遊戲等娛樂使用行為有明顯提昇(上升8%)。

不再無所事事的閒晃,現在的網路使用者上網是更具理性且有計劃

  • 過去當網路環境還較為單純時,使用者在網路上從事的活動大同小異,但隨著這幾年網路服務的推陳出新(例如微網誌、新型態的社交媒體)以及各種可連網的手持裝置相繼問世,不僅提供更多網路上的活動選擇、同時也加深了網友彼此間在使用行為上的差異化。
  • 相較過去,使用者上網時間有下降趨勢、同時並減少盲目在網路上閒逛的時間(使用者漫無目的上網的時間比例已從2007年的39%下降為2010年的21%)。此亦表示現在人們上網是目的導向且更效率化。此現象又以較早導入網路的歐美更為明顯。
  • 另外研究還發現,若把上網比喻成一趟旅行,發現人們每次上網多會先使用與私人有關的活動(例如社交網絡、個人部落格、檢查電子郵件),接著才會看看新聞、找尋娛樂、網路購物等進行較偏公領域的活動,但有趣的是最後要下線前,又會再回到私領域的使用項目。

手持裝置上網行為初探

現在正夯的可連網多點觸控式手持裝置使用者之上網行為又是如何?研究發現:

  • 手持裝置因為攜帶方便且可一直連網,因此不像電腦上網會有明顯高低峰的使用時段。
  • 在網路使用動機上,和電腦上網一樣,「溝通」也是手持裝置上網最主要的目的。不過在「娛樂」與「線上交易」動機上則明顯較電腦上網來得低。



對行銷人員的啟示
隨著使用者上網行為的理智化與目的導向,傳統網路廣告很難再發揮效果。若網路廣告想要引起網友注意,必須深入思考使用者的上網行為脈絡與背後動機,將品牌訊息很自然的置入在使用者主動接觸的內容或網路服務裡頭才不致引發反感。
例如在行為脈絡上,網路在一天中的不同時段扮演了不同角色,所以行銷人員應該要在不同時段發揮創意、靈活地以不同訊息與內容來跟使用者溝通。而在使用者上網的動機部分,「溝通」仍是目前上網最主要的動機,另外同樣不可忽略的還有「創作」動機的重要性,若考量這兩項上網動機,行銷人員即可思考如何運用創意來吸引使用者藉由廣告主所提供的一些小工具來共同創造他們會覺得有趣、有意義的內容,然後熱情分享給親朋好友。
因此簡而言之,現今廣告策略需以巧「拉」方式取代傳統的強「推」形式。同時再靈活運用「付費」(Paid)、「擁有」(Owned)與「賺到」(Earned)等不同的行銷訊息刊載方式、多管齊下,以攫取使用者目光與提昇對品牌的好感度。更高者,所傳遞的訊息若能協助使用者滿足該次上網的需求、幫助他們達成任務或讓他們從中得到樂趣,此又將更會是成功有效的品牌互動操作。

Filed under , having 0 意見  

The Web Is Shrinking. Now What?

2011年7月8日 星期五 by :::陽光馬戲團:::

We all read the statistics every week documenting the meteoric new growth areas of the Internet, and they are impressive:

Online video is exploding, with annual user growth of more than 45 percent. Mobile-device time spent increased 28 percent last year — with average smartphone time spent doubling. And social networks are now used by 90 percent of U.S. Internet users — for an average of more than four hours a month.

None of this is a newsflash. Every venture capitalist, Web publisher, and digital marketer is hyper-aware of these three trends.

But what’s happening to the rest of the Web?

The Web Is Shrinking. Really.

When you take these three growth areas out of the picture, the size of the hole left behind is staggering: the rest of the Web — the tried and true core that we thought would have limitless growth — is already shrinking.

Here are the facts:

When you exclude just Facebook from the rest of the Web, consumption in terms of minutes of use shrank by nearly nine percent between March 2010 and March 2011, according to data from comScore. And, even when you include Facebook usage, total non-mobile Internet consumption still dropped three percent over the same period.

We’ve known that social is growing lightning fast — notably, Facebook consumption, which grew by 69 percent — but now it’s clear that Facebook is not growing in addition to the Web. Rather, it’s actually taking consumption away from the publishers who compete on the rest of the Web.

And just what is the rest of the Web?

I have been calling it the “document Web,” based on how Google and other Web architectures view its pages as documents, linked together. But increasingly, it might as well be called the “searchable Web” since it’s accessed predominantly as a reference, and navigated primarily via search.

And it’s becoming less relevant.

In the last year, Facebook’s share of users’ time online grew from one out of every 13 minutes of use nationwide, to one out of every eight. In aggregate, that means the document Web was down more than half a billion hours of use (that’s more than 800 lifetimes) this March versus last March. And in financial terms, that represents a lost opportunity of $2.2 billion in advertising inventory that didn’t exist this year.

The Creation of a New, Connected Web

The change in the Web’s direction is a clear indication to me that we aren’t just in the midst of a boom for new interaction modes, but rather in a generational overhaul of the Internet.

What replaces the declining searchable Web is a new and “fully connected” digital life. You may have heard this before. After all, the promise of the Web was to connect pages with hyperlinks. Well, this time, “connected” means much more. It means the Web connects us, as people, to each one of the individuals online; and those connections, ultimately, extend from one of us to all of us.

Just as significantly, this all happens in real time, and at nearly all times.

And here’s what’s different when you connect people, as opposed to pages: Now, the Web knows who we are (identity), is with us at all times wherever we go (mobile), threads our relationships with others (social), and delivers meaningful experiences beyond just text and graphics (video).

The connected, social Web is alive, moving, proactive, and personal, while the document Web is just an artifact — suited as a universal reference, but hardly a personal experience.

The Social Web Versus the Searchable Web

Analytical explanations — increasing smartphone penetration, bandwidth availability, and technology sophistication — fill in some of the gaps as we try to understand this sea change, but they fall short.

Something larger is afoot, and it’s not about science or technology. Rather, as human beings, we have changed how we fit the Internet into our lives.

And the nature of the Web is changing to match. The old searchable Web is crashing; while the new connected, social Web is lifting off.

The implications for publishers are massive.

The last decade has been defined by the rise of Google as the nearly limitless supplier of traffic to digital media properties. And so a generation of digital media publishers developed and followed the same playbook: create lots of content around top keywords, engineer for search engine optimization (SEO) and expand the surface area in search engines to reach more users. The objective was to catch visitors in their net; expand reach — as measured by ComScore — look more impressive to advertisers and capture more demand.

The landscape is changing, and fast.

SEO’s strategic value is quickly fading as Google’s growth slows and its prominence in distribution slides away. In its place, Facebook has become the wiring hub of the connected Web — a new “home base” alternative to Google’s dominance of the last decade. Facebook began receiving as many visits as Google in March 2010, and already garners more than three times as many minutes as Google each month from users, according to comScore. Looking ahead, the best projections of U.S. online reach indicate that Facebook will surpass Google on that metric in less than a year, too.

And with this change, the nature of the relationship between users and publishers is being altered fundamentally — and perhaps forever.

Search offers a utility relationship, connecting users to content for the briefest of transactions; typically, it provokes users to just one pageview so they can find a piece of information, and then they move on.

But social discovery builds a relationship. Leveraging social endorsements and an environment of serendipitous discovery, consumers meet publishers in a meaningful context. As a result, the relationship that forms is stronger — and, more importantly for publishers, it’s branded.

Unlike the ecosystem set up by Google, where the search engine ironically intermediates between users and the objects of their queries (so that users reinforce their loyalty to Google, far more than to the publisher), in the world of social publishing, the Facebook hub enables a direct, if constrained, relationship between users and media brands.

The results — at least for my own company, Wetpaint — are that social media brings more qualified eyeballs and retains them. People who come via social media stay longer on the first visit; and they are more likely to come back sooner and more frequently. Overall, our visitors from social networks have a relationship that’s several times stronger — and several times as valuable when measured in engagement, pageviews, and revenues — than the relationships people form when then arrive through search.

The Human Connection

But it’s not just a change in mechanics. It’s a change in our human relationships.

Lewis D’Vorkin, the Chief Product Officer at Forbes, speaks of it when he and Alex Knapp talk about “live” media, quantum entanglement and mutually rewarding relationships that bind authors and readers on the new connected Web. It’s a sense of the Web moving from static published reference to living digital companion.

But there’s even more, and this vast change foreshadows bigger and better impacts on our lives. The greatest innovators in social media are driving exactly along that edge today. As one friend commented recently on the full potential of connected lives, by being joined more closely together, we can increase empathy and meaning, while decreasing isolation.

Toward a Fully Connected Future

Admittedly, we’re early in the replacement cycle when it comes to the connected Web. Even for strong connected Web performers like Huffington Post, Wetpaint, and others, the sum total of traffic from Facebook, Twitter, video, and mobile may add up to only half the total, or less.

But the trend has tipped, and with that tip has come both the business necessity and the human impact potential of elevating the relationship.

As the document Web of old shrinks, the new connected Web expands and delivers experiences that make our time online more effective, efficient, and enjoyable.

And that changes the role of companies on the Web from mere content publishers or providers to truly connected digital partners for real people.

Ben Elowitz (@elowitz) is co-founder and CEO of web publisher Wetpaint, and author of the Digital Quarters blog about the future of digital media. Prior to Wetpaint, Elowitz co-founded Blue Nile (NILE). He is an angel investor in media and e-commerce companies.

Filed under , having 0 意見